MarketingGrowth & Acquisition

Diversifying paid acquisition beyond Google and Meta: a practical playbook

Google and Meta still consume the majority of digital ad budgets, but that concentration is now a liability, not just a missed opportunity. This playbook walks through how to identify, test, and scale alternative paid channels without destabilising your existing performance baseline.

🎙️

Listen to the podcast

4 min

Google and Meta together captured roughly 48% of global digital ad spend in 2025, according to Magna Global (IPG's media research unit). For most B2C and B2B brands, the actual budget concentration is worse than the market average, with many companies directing 70% or more of paid media into just two auction systems. The problem is not that these platforms perform badly. The problem is that when they do underperform, you have no fallback, no pricing power in negotiations, and no data to benchmark against.

In 2026, several pressures have made this concentration harder to defend. Privacy regulation has reduced Meta's signal quality meaningfully since the iOS 14 rollout. Google's search results pages now carry more AI-generated answers, which compresses click-through rates on paid ads in certain query categories. CPCs on both platforms have trended upward for three consecutive years. The structural conditions that made "just buy Google and Meta" a reasonable default are no longer in place.

Building your diversification plan: a sequenced approach

Step 1: audit your current channel mix and identify the actual risk

Before adding anything new, calculate your revenue concentration by platform. Pull 12 months of data and express each channel as a percentage of attributed conversions and attributed revenue. If any single platform accounts for more than 40% of paid revenue, you have a concentration risk worth addressing. Document your average CPCs and CPAs on Google and Meta, because you will need these baselines to evaluate alternatives honestly.

Step 2: segment your alternatives by audience fit, not by novelty

The instinct is to ask "what channels exist?" The better question is "where do my specific buyers spend time that I am not currently paying to reach?" This produces a shorter, more useful list.

For B2B software and services companies, LinkedIn remains the most defensible alternative. Yes, LinkedIn CPCs are high (often $8 to $15 for sponsored content in North America, per data from several agency benchmarks). But if your average contract value is above $20,000, the unit economics work, and the targeting by job title and company size is genuinely difficult to replicate elsewhere. LinkedIn's data is self-reported and professionally maintained, which gives it a different quality profile than Meta's inferred interest signals.

For direct-to-consumer brands with visual products, Pinterest and TikTok Ads deserve real budget, not pilot budgets of $2,000. Pinterest users are in active planning mode for purchases in home, fashion, food, and adjacent categories. According to Forrester research, Pinterest's purchase intent signal among its active user base is measurably higher than on platforms where browsing is primarily entertainment-driven. TikTok's ad platform has matured considerably, and for brands targeting 18-to-34 audiences, the cost per reach is still lower than Meta in many categories.

For retail and CPG, retail media networks (Amazon Ads, Walmart Connect, Kroger Precision Marketing) now deserve a line in your paid media plan. Amazon Ads in particular has grown into the third-largest digital ad business in the world, and it sits at the point of purchase in a way no other platform does.

Step 3: run structured tests, not experiments

"Testing" a new channel by putting $5,000 into it for one month tells you almost nothing. Structure your tests properly. Allocate enough budget to reach statistical significance for your conversion goals (typically at least 500 to 1,000 conversion events per variant, depending on your model). Run for a minimum of six weeks before drawing conclusions. Set your success metric before launch: either CPA parity with your Google baseline, or a CPA premium you are willing to accept given the audience quality.

One practical approach: identify a specific product line or audience segment that performs well on Google, then run the same offer on one alternative platform using the same creative logic. This gives you a controlled comparison rather than a clean-slate experiment that mixes too many variables.

Step 4: assign real ownership

New channels fail when they are run by whoever has spare capacity. Each alternative channel needs one named owner, a defined budget, a quarterly review cadence, and a decision rule: at what CPA does this channel get scaled, and at what CPA does it get cut? Without this structure, alternative channels sit in perpetual "promising but not ready" status and never get the attention needed to optimise.

Pitfalls that kill diversification programs

The most common failure: treating alternative channels as a creative afterthought. Creative that works on Google search (short, intent-matching copy) will not work on TikTok (native-feeling video) or Pinterest (aspirational imagery with ambient branding). Repurposing Google display assets for TikTok is one of the fastest ways to waste money on a new platform. Budget for channel-specific creative from the start.

The second failure: measuring everything on last-click. Alternative channels, particularly those higher in the consideration funnel like Pinterest or LinkedIn, rarely win on last-click attribution. You need view-through windows, assisted conversion reports, or incrementality testing to see their real contribution. Companies that apply last-click to everything will systematically defund channels that are, in fact, working.

A third failure, less discussed: negotiating with new platforms too late. LinkedIn, Amazon, and retail media networks all have managed services and preferred partner programs that provide better data, lower CPMs, and early access to beta features. Brands that start spending without these relationships pay full price and get commodity service. Engage platform representatives early, even before your budget is substantial.

Quick wins to start this week

  • Pull your 12-month paid media spend by platform today and calculate the percentage of paid revenue attributable to Google and Meta separately.
  • Contact your LinkedIn account representative (if you are B2B) and ask for a current benchmark CPA for your category and target job titles, then compare it against your current Google CPA.
  • Identify one product line or audience segment with at least 200 conversions per month on Google, and designate it as your controlled test case for one alternative channel.
  • Review your creative production process and calculate whether your team can produce channel-native assets for a new platform within your current workflow, or whether you need an additional resource.

The goal is not to abandon Google and Meta. Both still offer scale that no alternative matches. The goal is to reduce the point at which a platform policy change, an auction shift, or a privacy update can materially damage your revenue in a single quarter. Companies that diversified paid acquisition before 2022 weathered Meta's iOS signal loss far better than those that did not. The time to build that resilience is before you need it.

Finished reading?

Validate your read to earn XP and feed your radar.