+150 XP

Positioning to win in a crowded SaaS category

# Positioning to win in a crowded SaaS category

A founder demos her new CRM to a 300-person prospect. Contacts, pipeline, sequences, a clean interface. The prospect nods, then asks the question that ends the deal: "So how is this different from HubSpot?" She answers with a feature list. Two weeks later the prospect renews HubSpot.

Nothing was wrong with the product. What was wrong was the shelf it was standing on. Review sites list hundreds of products under CRM, and hundreds more under project management, and no buyer works through them. They anchor on the name they already know and treat everyone else as a cheaper version of it. This lesson is about the three choices that break that anchor: the category you claim, the alternative you agree to be measured against, and the one claim the leader cannot copy inside a quarter. Which acquisition motion you then run on top of that position is a separate decision, settled in the motion lesson.

Why "better" is a losing bet

"Better than HubSpot" is a trap. HubSpot (which sells marketing software, so read its own positioning as a sales asset) spends roughly half its revenue on sales and marketing, and has been publishing against the same buyer since 2006. Compete on its terms and you are arguing about who has more integrations, in a comparison the buyer will resolve in favour of the safer name.

Positioning is the context you set so a buyer understands what your product is, who it is for, and why it is the obvious pick. It is not a tagline. It sits underneath the pricing page, the demo script and the first ten minutes of a sales call.

Bad positioning defaults to whatever the market already assumes. If the buyer files you under "another CRM", you inherit every comparison to the leader, including the ones you lose.

Dunford's framework, briefly

April Dunford, who sells positioning workshops for a living, lays this out in *Obviously Awesome* as a sequence of building blocks.

1. Competitive alternatives. What would customers do if you did not exist? Rarely just "the other software". Often a spreadsheet, an email thread, or an external consultant.

2. Unique attributes. What you have that those alternatives lack.

3. Value. What those attributes are worth, in the buyer's terms.

4. Target customers. The buyers who care most about that value.

5. Market category. The frame that makes the value obvious. This is the block most teams never touch.

The competitive alternative and the category are choices you make, not facts handed to you. Change either and everything downstream moves.

Dunford's own site has a clear, free primer worth reading: aprildunford.com.

Step 1: shift the competitive alternative

Personio sells HR software to small and mid-sized European companies. Munich, founded 2015, more than 10,000 customers, valued around $8.5 billion in its 2022 round.

The lazy competitive alternative for an HR product is SAP SuccessFactors or Workday. Ask instead what a 120-person engineering firm in Stuttgart actually does today:

  • one folder per employee on a shared drive, with scanned contracts
  • an Excel holiday tracker maintained by the office manager
  • Word templates for contracts and probation letters
  • payroll data emailed to an external tax adviser before the monthly cut-off

That is the real alternative, and it costs zero in software. Most of those firms were never in a Workday evaluation; enterprise HCM arrives with a consulting project and a six-figure first year, so they never got past the first call.

Why this matters commercially

Measured against Workday, preconfigured German employment-law workflows, absence rules that match local entitlements, a clean payroll handover to the tax adviser and self-serve onboarding in weeks are footnotes. Measured against the shared drive and the Excel file, each one decides the deal.

The second-order effect lands on pricing. When your alternative is free, your entry price is judged against zero rather than against a licence, which pushes you toward a small per-employee monthly fee and a business case written in recovered admin hours and avoided compliance risk. Choose Workday as your reference and you have licensed yourself to charge more, but you have also signed up for procurement, security reviews and a sales cycle measured in quarters.

Step 2: reframe the category

Category is the mental shelf the buyer puts you on, and the shelf carries the evaluation criteria. On the HCM suite shelf, buyers ask about payroll in 40 countries, org modelling and compensation planning. On the shelf Personio claimed, HR software built for small and mid-sized European companies, the questions are different: can we go live before the next payroll run, does it know our labour law, who administers it when we have no HR department.

HubSpot took the harder version of the same move. In 2006 it could have fought for the email marketing shelf, or the CRM shelf against Salesforce. Instead it named inbound marketing, published the book in 2009, and built free training and certifications so buyers arrived already using its vocabulary. The cost is worth noting: category creation took years of content spend, and once HubSpot moved upmarket it landed on the CRM shelf anyway, next to Salesforce. A category you create is shelter, not a permanent moat.

You are not inventing a market. Both shelves above existed, with real competitors on them. You are choosing the arena where your attributes read as strengths.

🎬 [VIDEO: "April Dunford on Positioning" - youtube.com - Dunford explains why category choice is the highest-leverage positioning decision, with concrete B2B examples]

Step 3: anchor value to the new frame

Once the shelf changes, rewrite the value in that shelf's language. The generic version of an HR product says:

> "A modern platform to manage your people processes and collaborate across teams."

The framed version says:

> "Every contract, absence and payroll change in one place, so your office manager stops rebuilding the holiday spreadsheet and payroll goes out on time."

Notice the vocabulary: probation, absence, payroll cut-off, office manager. A buyer in a 120-person firm recognises their own week in those words. "People processes" signals a product built for someone else.

Each value claim has to trace back to an attribute and to the alternative you named. The payroll export matters because a spreadsheet emailed to a tax adviser produces errors someone finds three weeks later. Preconfigured workflows matter because there is no HR team to configure anything. And any comparative claim you put in that copy has to keep holding as the product ships weekly, which is the regulatory problem the advertising-claims lesson takes up.

Step 4: name the target customer precisely

Positioning sharpens as the target narrows. "Growing companies" shapes nothing. "German and Austrian companies of 50 to 500 employees with no dedicated HR system" shapes the demo, the case studies, the ad targeting and which integrations get built first.

Basecamp shows how far that can be taken. It has stayed with small teams that reject enterprise complexity, sells a flat monthly fee for unlimited users rather than per seat, and is run by a few dozen people. The trade is explicit: no enterprise features, no upmarket path, a hard ceiling on account value, and in exchange no enterprise sales organisation to fund. Narrowing does not shrink the market you can address later. It does commit the organisation you build now.

Knowledge check

1. According to the lesson, why is the prospect's question 'How is this different from Asana?' described as a positioning failure rather than a product failure?

2. Why does the lesson argue that positioning your product as 'better than Asana' is a losing bet in a crowded category?

3. In Dunford's framework, why is identifying 'competitive alternatives' about more than just rival software?

MULTIPLE CHOICE

4. Select ALL correct answers about how the lesson defines positioning.

Select all the correct answers.

MULTIPLE CHOICE

5. Select ALL correct answers describing the correct ordering logic of Dunford's building blocks.

Select all the correct answers.

Putting it together: the repositioning in one page

  • For: European companies of roughly 50 to 500 employees
  • Who: run HR on shared drives, Word templates, an Excel holiday tracker and a monthly email to the tax adviser
  • It is: HR software built for small and mid-sized companies, not a scaled-down enterprise suite
  • That: puts contracts, absences, onboarding and payroll handover in one system a non-specialist can run, live in weeks
  • Unlike: HCM suites that need a consulting project, or generic tools with no local employment logic

Same product as "another HR tool, but better". Different competitive position, because the suite comparison never comes up.

Common mistakes to avoid

Claiming a category the product cannot hold. Claim local employment logic without the absence rules and the payroll handover and the buyer finds the gap in the second demo. Positioning frames real strengths; it does not manufacture them.

Reframing works only if buyers already recognise the frame. Check the review-site category names, the search terms and, above all, the words prospects use on discovery calls to describe their problem. An invented buzzword is a frame only your team can see.

Positions drift as you move upmarket, and the drift is expensive. Zendesk won early by being the simple cloud help desk against on-premise incumbents in 2007. As it pushed into broader customer experience suites, its reference competitor became Salesforce Service Cloud, where "simple" reads as "thin"; shareholders rejected its bid for Momentive in early 2022 and the company was taken private later that year for about $10 billion. Revisit the alternative and the category annually, and after any move into a new segment.

Do not confuse positioning with messaging. Positioning is the frame; messaging is the words on the site. And a position that lives only in a document is not a position: if the rep still answers "how are you different from HubSpot" with a feature list, nothing has changed.

Key takeaways

  • The competitive alternative is a choice. For most vertical and SMB SaaS, the honest answer is spreadsheets and manual work, which makes ordinary features decisive and sets your price against zero.
  • Category decides the criteria. Move off the crowded generic shelf onto one where the buyer's questions are questions you win.
  • Creating a category is slow and temporary. HubSpot spent years building the inbound frame and still ended up competing on the CRM shelf.
  • Write value in the buyer's vocabulary: probation, absence, payroll cut-off. Generic nouns signal a product built for someone else.
  • Narrowing the target commits the company, not just the copy. Basecamp's small-team position rules out an enterprise sales organisation, which is the point.